Wednesday, September 2, 2026

Marco Rubio Controversies Since 2017 - Now.


Rubio was one of Trump's harshest Republican critics in 2016. He called Trump a “con artist” and warned that he shouldn't be trusted with the presidency.


Over the next several years, Rubio became one of Trump's strongest allies.


That change isn't wrongdoing by itself, but it's important context for everything that followed.


Asking China to Investigate Biden:


In 2019, Trump publicly said China should investigate Joe Biden.


When Rubio was asked about it, he suggested Trump might just be “needling the press.”


Rubio had no way of knowing that was Trump's intention. Instead of criticizing a president for asking a foreign government to investigate a political opponent, he gave Trump a more innocent explanation.


Trump's First Impeachment:


During Trump's first impeachment trial, Rubio argued that even if Trump's actions met the standard for impeachment, removing him from office could still be bad for the country.


He also voted against calling additional witnesses and ultimately voted to acquit Trump.


His argument wasn't simply that Trump had done nothing wrong. It was that removal wasn't justified even if his actions were impeachable.


January 6:


Rubio strongly condemned the January 6 attack on the Capitol and voted to certify Joe Biden's victory.


He later voted to acquit Trump in his second impeachment trial.


Rubio also voted against creating an independent bipartisan commission to investigate January 6.


Later, he called the House January 6 investigation a “complete partisan scam.”


2020 Election Claims:


Rubio originally accepted Biden's 2020 victory.


By 2024, he was repeating several claims about problems with the election, including questionable signatures, ballot drop boxes and alleged vote buying.


Fact-checkers and government investigations found that several of the specific claims he repeated were unsupported or misleading.


Foreign Students and Political Speech:


After becoming Secretary of State in 2025, Rubio supported revoking visas from foreign students involved in pro-Palestinian activism.


The State Department reviewed people's social media and political activity while looking for people whose visas could be revoked.


Rubio publicly said hundreds of visas had been revoked.


A federal judge later ruled that the administration's campaign violated First Amendment protections.


Rümeysa Öztürk:


One of the clearest examples involved Rümeysa Öztürk, a Turkish graduate student at Tufts University.


Öztürk had helped write a student newspaper opinion piece criticizing the university's response to the war in Gaza.


According to reporting on internal government records, officials looked for evidence connecting her to Hamas or antisemitic activity and didn't find it.


Her visa was revoked anyway.


The revocation was made “silent,” meaning she wasn't notified beforehand.


Masked plainclothes immigration officers later detained her on the street.


Whatever someone's position on Israel or Gaza, using immigration powers against someone when the government's own investigation failed to establish the alleged extremist connection raises serious concerns about political speech and government power.


Visa Restrictions on 75 Countries:


In January 2026, Rubio's State Department suspended immigrant-visa processing for citizens of 75 countries.


The administration said the policy was intended to prevent immigrants from becoming dependent on public assistance.


In August 2026, a federal judge struck down the policy, ruling that Rubio had exceeded the authority Congress gave him.


USAID:


Rubio became acting head of USAID while also serving as Secretary of State.


Under his leadership, roughly 83% of USAID programs were terminated.


The administration also froze foreign-aid money that Congress had already approved.


Federal courts ruled against important parts of the administration's approach, finding that the executive branch could not simply ignore spending decisions made by Congress.


Signal Military Chat:


Rubio was part of the 2025 Signal group chat where senior Trump officials discussed an upcoming U.S. military operation against the Houthis in Yemen.


A journalist was accidentally added to the group.


Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth appears to have shared the most sensitive military information, not Rubio.


Rubio's involvement still meant the Secretary of State was participating in a commercial messaging-app conversation where sensitive information about an upcoming military attack was being discussed.


El Salvador Prison Deal:


El Salvador's president offered to imprison people deported from the United States, including potentially American citizens convicted of crimes.


Rubio praised the offer while acknowledging there could be legal problems with sending American citizens to foreign prisons.


El Salvador's prison system has also faced serious criticism over prison conditions, mass detention and lack of due process.


Human Rights Reports:


The State Department publishes reports on human-rights abuses around the world.


Under Rubio, those reports were significantly changed.


Criticism of some governments friendly with Trump, particularly El Salvador, was reduced.


At the same time, some governments that had poor relationships with the Trump administration received harsher treatment.


That raised concerns that America's official human-rights reports were being influenced by political relationships rather than applying the same standards to everyone.


Mass Visa Revocations:


Rubio has acknowledged that the State Department revoked thousands of visas.


His department has also developed additional large-scale visa-revocation programs.


The federal government has broad authority over visas. The controversy is over how that authority has been used, especially when political speech and social-media activity are involved.


Deportations to Third Countries:


Rubio's State Department helped negotiate agreements allowing the United States to deport some immigrants to countries they weren't originally from.


Immigration attorneys and human-rights organizations argue that this can weaken protections intended to prevent people from being sent somewhere they could face abuse or persecution.


NRA Support:


Rubio has received substantial political support from the National Rifle Association.


Claims that the NRA simply gave Rubio millions of dollars are misleading. Much of that money was independently spent by the NRA to help elect him rather than being given directly to Rubio.


After the 2018 Parkland school shooting, a student asked Rubio to promise that he would no longer accept NRA support.


Rubio refused.


This doesn't prove that the NRA bought Rubio's votes, but the financial relationship is worth knowing when evaluating his record on gun legislation.


Oil and Gas Money:


Rubio has also received significant campaign support from people and organizations connected to the oil and gas industry.


He has generally supported policies favorable to that industry.


Again, campaign contributions don't prove bribery. They do create reasonable questions about the influence major donors have on politicians.


Concentration of Power:


Under Trump's second administration, Rubio held several powerful positions.


In addition to Secretary of State, he served at different times as acting national security adviser, acting administrator of USAID and acting National Archivist.


Those appointments were not automatically illegal or corrupt.


They did give one Trump ally an unusual amount of control over foreign policy, national security, visas, foreign aid and other parts of the federal government.


So... There's plenty to be upset about.


There isn't strong evidence that Marco Rubio has been taking bribes, stealing government money or personally enriching himself through his government positions.


The bigger issue is his political transformation and how he has used government power.


Rubio went from warning that Trump was a dangerous “con artist” to defending him, voting against holding him accountable, repeating some of his disputed election claims and eventually becoming one of the most powerful officials in his administration.


Since becoming Secretary of State, the concerns have become more serious. Rubio has been directly involved in visa revocations tied to political activism, immigration restrictions later struck down by a federal court, the dismantling of USAID, controversial deportation programs and changes to how the United States reports human-rights abuses.


The strongest criticism of Rubio isn't that he's been caught in one huge corruption scandal.


It's that he spent years warning about Trump's behavior, gradually stopped opposing it, and eventually became one of the people helping carry it out.

Monday, August 24, 2026

Fix everything on day 1 people


This piece of shit promised he’d end the Ukraine war early November 2024. 

Texas Republicans blame Democrats for their failing state, the GoP has had total control there for 30 years and people still vote for them...

Friday, August 21, 2026

Trump couldn't tolerate the fact that Obama got it done

 


To the inevitable response from MAGA that Obama gave 'pallets' of cash...he released frozen Iranian assets.  Meanwhile the current Iran conflict has directly cost $38 billion militarily and a currently projected $87 billion in extra gas and diesel expenses.  Not to mention that the strategic oil reserves have been depleted to the point that experts warn that the caverns they're stored in could collapse. 

And Trump threw all that away, not because he really thought it was a bad deal, but just out of pure spite due to his hatred and envy of Obama.

And IAEA inspectors could randomly check nuclear facilties and "suspicious sites". That JCPOA has never looked so good. And Obama received nothing but relentless hate from the Right and the Israel Lobby for getting that deal. Iran will never agree to those kinds of terms ever again.


Friday, August 14, 2026

Party of Fiscal conservatives


 Trump is a mockery of traditional GOP values. And their subservience to him shows they never actually believed any of it.

The republican party pretends to be fiscal conservatives, but only when a democrat is in office.

Trump is a veritable black hole of waste fraud abuse greed and incompetence.

Remember the republicans going bat 💩 crazy after Obama remodeled to put a basketball court in. They even lied saying he spent $376 million doing it. In fact audits showed he spent a couple of thousand out of his own pocket. Not a penny of tax payer $’s.

The man/admin that increased the national debt by what.. 43%?

Tuesday, August 11, 2026

Rigged 2020 election


 There were other “perfect” calls plus the fake electors, the threats against Pence and the January 6 mob organized and incited by Trump.


60 whatever cases.. all lost.. their own investigations find nothing. Trump on audio saying he wants them to find votes. And MAGA is actually brainwashed into thinking the election was stolen from Trump. I can't even imagine the level of willful ignorance to make this claim.


What's amazing is that he's still trying to steal the 2020 election, and yet most people are unwilling to entertain the possibility that he stole 2024.

Sunday, August 9, 2026

Latest TACO on Iran War




 Trump willing to end Iran war without nuclear deal – WSJ

WASHINGTON—For weeks, President Trump had been laying the groundwork to declare victory in the Iran war should Tehran fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz, even floating the idea privately to senior aides that he’s willing to walk away without a nuclear deal, U.S. officials said.

So it was all for..........nothing.

The main bargaining item now is the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, which was already open before all of this. 

Arguably worse. It would legitimise a nuclear program.

And Iran gets to toll the straight. And US international reputation is (even further) destroyed. And US  spent tens of billions worth of munitions.

So, the very thing the nuclear pact that Obama had Kerry work 3-4 solid years on achieving, which measured and prevented nuclear weapons from occurring, that Donald shredded his first year in office his first term?

What a brilliant waste of trillions of U.S. tax dollars, oh and countless expired human lives in vain, conservatives!

However, because of this war, Iran knows it has its own porcupine tool even without nukes. Closing Hormuz was largely hypothetical. They saw it as a card they could play, but the US has long been unchallenged for its ability to force open international waterways militarily in a lopsided manner. Now Iran knows it can play that card successfully whenever it wants and that accomplishes a lot of the same things as a nuclear weapon would in terms of putting off anyone who might want to militarily force a regime change. Any future US president will weigh the option of tolerating some level of IRGC bullshit versus gambling the loss of their seat of power because the voters hate what happens next.



Monday, August 3, 2026

Vindictive President

 White House admits it scrapped grants to blue states because they didn’t vote for Trump

During last fall’s government shutdown, the Trump administration started cutting energy grants to states, but the only states that were seriously affected were ones Donald Trump lost in the 2024 election.

We’re talking about a White House that admits it withholds federal resources from states based on local voters casting ballots in ways the president doesn’t like. Not to put too fine a point on this, but that sounds an awful lot like an impeachable offense. It’s a fundamental corruption of how federal tax dollars are allocated.

So, not the presidential administration for the ENTIRE United States. Got it. We’ll just have to deal with this domestic enemy, best we can.

Reminder that the Secretary of Energy stood in front of Congress last month and testified that "no decisions were made on politics" regarding the grant cancellations. Now his department tells a judge that yep they did just that.

It shouldn't even matter because it shouldn't be a partisan issue, but it's crazy that this admin never seems to understand or care that "blue" states like California can still have more Republican voters than most "red" states.

The Trump administration knows that the Republican voters in California will blame the Democrat voters in California for the cancellation of the grants to California. The Heritage Foundation wants to anger the Republican voters in the hopes that they will then be more willing to accept the murder of American citizens who don't support the Trump Administration.

This is an excellent justification for impeachment, possibly the best justification. It would bring this Administration's illegality into the spotlight while also forcing Republicans to make a decision: Either impeach/convict for these obviously partisan actions, or indirectly approve a Democratic Administration in performing the same stunts