"Plaintiffs write to alert the Court of a material factual error by defendants on which the panel relied to grant a stay pending appeal," the citation of supplemental authorities reads. "Given that reliance, and the gravity of the interests at stake, plaintiffs ask that the panel immediately withdraw its order or, in the alternative, that the en banc court immediately vacate it."
The administration said they redeployed 115 Federal Protective Service officers to Portland, and the ninth circuit based their ruling on that figure.
A few days after the ruling, Oregon officials discovered the numbers were actually between 20 and 30.
How many DOJ attorneys will be disbarred because of Trump?
The magaverse media sieve will separate these facts from reality, as they do with all inconvenient truths.
The trump klan will call it lies, fake news, activist judges, etc.. And the right wing echo chamber will pick it up as the preferred narrative, and the maga base will stay happymad.
For the lazy:
The fed argued that Portland wasn't able to enforce federal law because they needed 115 troops deployed over the summer. They worded it as if all 115 were needed and deployed at once and stayed for a long time. They were not. There were 4 separate instances of about 30 troops spread apart for light assistance and they quickly went home.
Basically, Portland is entirely capable of dealing with protests.
No comments:
Post a Comment